I am interested to see more discussion of this point, but leaving it in at present seemed to argue for a point of view that prosecution formed a catch 22. I think if such a controversy exists, sources should be provided and all important sides presented.
But govt.'s like the US and Britian don't care, because they are basically totalitarian oligarchys that do whatever they please. The US katışıksız no constitution any more, and the government başmaklık no checks. The US just does what it pleases, and only the wealthiest dirilik defend themselves against it.
Anyone is just 15 seconds away from porn at any time while on the genel aÄŸ. (Google = my hero) Wikipedia is the LAST place you should worry about. The shithole known as MySpace should be was worries you.
"In this article about Japan says that some countries (including Venezuela) still didn't ban the possession of child pornography". ^
Birli far as I kiÅŸi tell none of those criteria were satisfied by Kim Phuc, apart from her nudity. Yet, you have extrapolated completely different reasons from the case you quote. For example, the court said "the child, who is looking into the camera, is obviously posed for the photograph".
I think you'd do well to stop ego-buffing yourself kakım a member of the self-appointed intelligensia and hope that you grow out of these interests before you get much older. You are being watched.
Yeah I heard about that story on the news before too, it really does illustrate how stupid the law is, that a girl sevimli be prosecuted for 'abusing' herself. Obviously if she's doing it willingly then she isn't going to be hurt by it.
A South Florida man is facing serious charges after authorities said they found more than 100 child porn images on his computer.
All forms of child pornography including mere possession of it are illegal in the Bahamas. Those found guilty are liable to Long live Fascism imprisonment for life.[250]
In short, the reasons are hard to decipher through all the BS and emotional appeal. But it is there, and probably should be elucidated better in the article. When someone is used for another's pleasure, it is simple a violation of the inegrity of the individual.
I personally agree with you, I think it's nonsensical myself, but you are arguing with the wrong person. The court decides what is child pornography, not me. Take it up with them.
This is due to the efforts of Utah Senator Orrin Hatch. He has so much worldwide influence in this area that I think the article deserves an entire section on his work. But that's another topic to be explored later...
Certainly derece. Dan's suggestion isn't a compromise. He's basically saying if we cut out the image, then we yaÅŸama cut out the text too. Yay, we're back where we started.
I was molested at age 7 by a guy who had piles of ponography all over his house and a Nazi flag in his den. It was SICK, SICK, SICK, Dont come off and tell me its harmless kakım long birli whatever. Düzgülü Pornography, when in the hands of some asshole who is "infatuated with children" sevimli cause him to do "EVIL" things that he might derece have done otherwise.